CILIP New Professionals' Conference
It's over a week since I attended the New Professionals' conference jointly run by CILIP's Career Development Group and the Diversity Group. Waiting a week to blog was a good plan because Laura has done the hard work blogging on the whole conference in 3 excellent posts over on Organising Chaos. I'm not going to try and match that so here are just a few of my observations from the day.
First up was Katie Hill talking about the consumer generation. The consumer generation knows what it wants and how to get it as well as what standards and services it expects. It is important to note that both library users and library staff are part of the consumer generation and this has a great impact on the service. We have to adapt to meet the new demands of our users. Katie gave an example from the University of York where the Lending Services team has been renamed Customer Services. This reflects a change in focus from the stock or resources to the users/customers. To sum this all up Katie used this great phrase:
"Librarians are no longer gatekeepers of information but gateways to information."
Ned Potter followed on from Katie with a presentation on librarian stereotypes. First he looked at the different types of stereotype presented in Maura Seale's article Old Maids, Policeman and Social Rejects. I've not really been confronted by the stereotypes but I often find that when I tell someone I'm a librarian they have nothing to say after that because they have no idea what being a librarian means these days. Ned's talk was entertaining but I don't think it really got us anywhere except that we all know that the stereotypical librarian is a myth.
Ned's best contribution to the conference for me was his discussion of the idea that we're only as good as our last customer interaction. Based on the old addage that a sportsman is only as good as his last game. He suggested that every time we engage with a user we should imagine that the whole service will be judged on our standard of service. This is something I am trying to employ when staffing the information desk - are you?
After lunch we got on to the topic of marketing. I'm not sure how Kath Aitken's talk on the skills a professional librarian can bring to public libraries fitted in here but it was thought provoking none the less. She began by looking at the value of a professional qualification in a public library from the perspective of someone who had started out as a library assistant then returned to work for the same employer post qualification. I found it intriguing to hear someone else's perspective on this as someone who has also held both a non-professional and a professional post in the same library. The talk of the value of the library qualification has been brought up again this week at Umbrella. I've seen lots of tweets suggesting that library qualifications are only desirable, not essential in most sectors. This is something that clearly needs more discussion.
The last presentation I want to mention was given by Jo Alcock on marketing yourself using online tools. She focused on three areas, social networking, blogging and microblogging and rounded her presentation off with ten top tips for marketing yourself online. As someone who already uses tools like Twitter and also maintains a blog it's always great to hear them being promoted. I find having an active professional presence online makes me feel so much more connected to the profession and other librarians and really inspires me to continue to develop my skills and interests.
Credits: image by bookgrl
Thoughts on CILIP, Twitter, Library School and Web2.0
Today, like a lot of other UK based librarians I participated in the CILIP Council Open Session on the use of Web2.0 via Twitter (tag #cilip2). The live session included presentations from Phil Bradley and Brian Kelly and a Q&A/discussion. It was also live blogged on the Library & Information Update blog.
My initial intention had been to just monitor the event just to keep up with what was happening. The experience however drew me in and at one point this morning (before the event started) I was up in the top 10 list of tweeters. If this event does nothing else it will have brought together a group of librarians professionally and geographically diverse.
I have high hopes however that something more will come out of it. I am not a member of CILIP and haven't been since I graduated from library school. My personal feeling is that CILIP doesn't engage me enough to warrant my membership fee. Depending on the outcome of today I may change my mind.
Anyway, what I really wanted to write about in this post were some thoughts I had on my cycle ride home as I was digesting the comments from the event. It's one thing to ask how CILIP are using web 2.0 tools and what their role is in leading the profession in their use but I also wonder how these tools are being used in teaching future professionals and whether they are being taught how these tools can be used in libraries and by librarians.
I graduated from library school nearly 3 years ago. We did a module called Hypermedia in which we had to create a website but there was no mention of the new technologies that were creeping on to the scene. My cohort were just beginning to use Facebook socially but there was no thought that it might have a place professionally. We used or perhaps it's better to say were forced to use Blackboard to communicate with the group and participate in group assignments. I wonder if today this is still the case or are people using tools like Ning to create social networks specific to their course?
Are future professionals being encouraged to experiment with new technologies and think of new ways to use them in libraries? Are they being asked to think about the potential drawbacks or legal issues? Are they being taught best practice? Are they debating where to draw the line between personal and professional or, if indeed there needs to be a line? Or are they teaching themselves?


