Computer scientists and drug dealers have users
Ever since I started working in libraries one thing has troubled me – what do we call the people who use our service? Where I used to work the most common term was Reader, but this for some reason always felt a bit odd and slightly pretentious to me. Working in an academic library I will often refer to them by their status at the University but this causes problems if you want to refer to them as the group as a whole. I don’t like calling them customers as they don’t pay us directly for the service we provide. What else can we call them?
This week I listened to R. David Lankes’ presentation The Librarian Militant, The Librarian Triumphant. At around 19 minutes he has an aside (from which the title of this post is taken) in which he expresses his opinion regarding this question:
By the way I will not use the word patron because we don’t pay them to paint or rather I guess receive money from them to paint. I don’t think they’re customers, I don’t think they’re consumers and god knows they’re not users. Right? Computer scientists and drug dealers have users, we do not. They’re members. If you ask them, and we do this all the time. If you go and ask the people in your library what should we call you? They look at you and go member; I got a card, I pay taxes. It’s a sense of ownership. Why don’t we give them that? They’re members.
So let’s add member to the mix. I like it and I have to say I think for the first time I feel some sense of closure on this question. But I’m interested in what you think… so here’s a question for you, what do you call the people who use your library? Tell me by responding to this poll.
Update (25/11/10): Voting in the poll is now closed. I’ve written up the results in the post What do you call the people who use your library?